8 Best Mirrorless Camera for Wildlife [2022]

Do you like nature photography?

Wondering what camera to buy?

A mirrorless camera might be the right choice for you.

They are smaller and lighter than DSLRs, and they still offer great features and performance.

So, which is the best mirrorless camera for wildlife photography? Keep reading to find out.

Our Top 3 Best Mirrorless Cameras for Wildlife

These are the top choices for high-end cameras currently available on the market. Here are our top 3.

1. Sony Alpha 1 Full-frame Interchangeable Lens Mirrorless Camera – Best Overall
2. Fujifilm X-T4 Mirrorless Camera – 2nd Choice
3. Nikon D780 DSLR Camera – 3rd Choice

Preface: Where and how I will conduct the examination

The Red Kite feeding station at Bwlch Nant Yr Arian in Mid-Wales and Gigrin Farm in Mid-Wales are the two locations I visit on a regular basis.

The procedure is nearly identical every time: at 3 p.m. (2 p.m. in winter), a big number of kites begin to assemble in the sky in significant numbers (up to 150, more in the cold season). Once the dinner is served, they take turns diving into the bowls of food before vanishing into a grove of trees.

For this reason, there is usually at least one kite that drops a piece of meat into the little lake, followed by another kite that is ready to collect it a few seconds later, providing us photographers with an additional possibility for a dramatic photograph.

It is not uncommon for kites to engage in fights with one another or with other birds. Based on the day, the quantity of kites present, and the time of year, the feast may last many hours or even several days.

The situation is great because I can shoot a large number of shots in a short period of time, experiment with different settings, and photograph the birds both in the sky (with a plain background) and against a hill or trees (with a contrasting background) (busy background). Kites are extremely quick, which provides a fun challenge for both the photographer and myself. They can also soar pretty close to the ground at times.

What I use to determine my score

Afterward, I transfer all of the photographs to my computer and import them into Adobe Lightroom. I begin by examining each photograph to determine how accurate the focus is. If the focus is somewhat off, I name it yellow, and if the picture is completely out of focus, I label it red.

From there, I calculate two percentages: one in which only the completely sharp shots are counted, and another in which both perfectly sharp and somewhat soft results are counted.

The reason for the second percentage is that, in many cases, an image can still be considered good even if the focus is not perfect. For specific purposes, a photograph can be used as long as you can see all of the features and don’t pixel peep. It also makes it possible for me to write a more precise analysis of the camera’s capabilities.

When I’m on location and experimenting with different settings, I record a small audio or video diary so that I can later organize the photographs according to the parameters that were used. Afterward, I calculate the % for each setting combination in order to determine which one produces the greatest outcome.

Because the performance of the bird is not significantly different depending on whether it is on a plain or busy background, I do not split the percentages by background type.

With the OM-D E-M1 II (firmware 3.0), here is an example that indicates that the 55 Target Group and the 18fps burst with the electronic shutter produce the best results.

I included two types of scores for each camera in this article for the sake of completeness (unless otherwise specified). Each score contains two percentage calculations, which are as follows:

The highest possible score, which demonstrates the best that the camera is capable of and the optimum settings to use. There are two colors for this: green (Perfect AF) and blue (Perfect + Slightly Soft AF).

The average score is the result achieved by averaging the results received with various settings. It may be found in the beige rectangle alongside information about the lenses that were used, the number of photos that were taken, and the version of the firmware.

The average score is essential because it demonstrates how different settings might have an impact on performance (for some cameras it can be like night and day). I’ve also experienced circumstances when I’ve shot with the same settings on two different days and returned home with somewhat different outcomes. This is driven by a number of circumstances, which I will discuss further below.

Variables

The keeper rate can be influenced by a variety of factors including less light (for example, heavy clouds instead of a sunny day), the time of year, and the kites’ unexpected behavior.

Winter brings an increase in kites, and they can consume all of the food in half an hour, leaving me with little time to experiment and test out different settings on the camera. The birds may elect to keep their distance until there are no humans present on the location, or they may decide to wait until the sun has set before returning (between 4pm and 5pm).

I’ve found that having less time means that if I don’t guess the correct settings immediately away when testing a new camera, I can end up with a really poor score.

Then there’s my own photographic ability, which I’ll talk about later. Inevitably, having been at it for the past four years, I’ve improved my performance throughout the course of that time. Having said that, mistakes on my part can still occur from time to time, and I may experience days when my tracking abilities are not as keen as they should be!

Although these variables rarely have a significant impact on the final score, it is appropriate to mention them. Unless there is an unforeseen circumstance that prevents me from doing so, if I am dissatisfied with a session, I always attempt to return the following day (bad weather or rented gear that needs to be sent back).

The Best Cameras for Wildlife Photography may be Found Here

In comparison to a few years ago, the case for DSLRs as the camera of choice for wildlife photographers is less clear-cut today, and there are now some mirrorless cameras that are excellent choices for wildlife photography in particular. Let’s take a look at some of our favorite cameras from both categories.

1. Sony Alpha Frame (A1) digital camera

If money is not an issue, the Sony Alpha A1 is an excellent camera for photographing wildlife because of its fantastic autofocus technology, which includes subject recognition and Real-time Eye AF for birds, as well as animals and humans.

In addition, because it has a 50.1Mp full-frame sensor, the low-ISO photographs it produces can resist a significant amount of cropping if you are unable to get near enough to the subject with the camera.

With a little patience and a willingness to shoot Jpegs or compressed raw files, the Sony A1 can shoot at speeds of up to 30 frames per second, and its buffer allows for sequences of up to 155 full-frame compressed raw files or 165 full-frame Jpegs to be shot at that blistering pace. A frame rate of 30 frames per second is excessive if you’re photographing a delicate grooming session around a badger set, but if you’re trying to record an aggressive cheetah charging in for the kill, that frame rate could make a major impact.

If you prefer to capture uncompressed raw files, the Sony A1 can still shoot at a maximum frame rate of up to 20 frames per second. Although that is likely more than you require around a badger set, it is excellent for fast action, and there are slower rates available as well.

In addition to a 9.44 million dot OLED Quad-XGA electronic viewfinder with a refresh rate of up to 240 frames per second, which ensures no blackout, the Sony A 1 features the highest resolution in its class with the highest resolution in its class. Apart from that, there’s an LCD display with a resolution of 1,440,000 dots and a 3-inch tilting touchscreen with a new menu arrangement and more extensive touch-control that was originally seen on the Sony A7S III.

The Sony A1 may be purchased via Wex Photo Video and Park Cameras in the United Kingdom, as well as Adorama and B&H Photo Video in the United States.

3 Top Options:

2. Fujifilm X-T4 Mirrorless Camera

If you want to shoot with a crop sensor camera, the Fujifilm X-T4 is a good option to consider. Because of its APS-C sensor, it doesn’t perform as well in low light as the Nikon Z 6II, but it is substantially smaller and more portable, and APS-C lenses are often less expensive than full frame lenses. This flagship model provides excellent all-around performance and is more than capable of handling the demands of everyday outdoor photography.

It has a long battery life, which is ideal for lengthy shooting days, and it is weather-sealed to keep rain and dust out. It can shoot at a fast burst rate of 12 frames per second to record speedy action, and it can shoot at an even quicker rate of 20 frames per second in its silent shooting mode, which is ideal for capturing animals that are prone to startling.

Overall, the image quality is outstanding, and even though the noise control is not quite as good as it could be, it is still excellent. In addition, it has a decent autofocus mechanism that does an excellent job tracking and keeping moving subjects in focus, albeit it can be a little erratic at times. Although it has a lower photo buffer and does not support CFexpress cards, it does feature two UHS-II SD card ports, which is a significant improvement.

If you want a full-frame camera with better low-light performance, the Nikon is the way to go; however, if you prefer the portability and focal range of an APS-C camera, the Fujifilm is a good option.

3 Top Options:

3. Nikon D780 DSLR Camera for wildlife photography

Among the DSLR cameras we’ve examined, the Nikon D780 is the most capable for birding and wildlife photography of any we’ve found. This powerful full-frame camera includes a plethora of customizable buttons and options, including custom shooting modes, that you can customize to your liking, allowing you to spend more time focusing on your subjects and less time navigating menus.

The camera’s optical viewfinder is large and comfortable to use, and it includes a weather-sealed casing for shooting in more inclement weather.

Although the battery life of this camera is supposed to be extremely lengthy (about 2,260 photos), it is more than adequate for long shooting days. However, battery performance is also dependent on your usage patterns.

Its full-frame sensor provides exceptional high-ISO performance, as well as superb RAW noise control, because of its large sensor area. Aside from that, it boasts a really effective autofocus system that performs an incredible job of tracking moving targets.

It can also shoot bursts at 8 frames per second in its high-speed continuous shooting mode, albeit it is limited to 4 frames per second in quiet mode.

Unfortunately, this camera does not have in-body image stabilization, thus you will need to utilize an optically stabilized lens when shooting handheld with this model of camera. Nikon, on the other hand, offers a diverse selection of DSLR lenses, several of which are equipped with good optical stabilization.

For example, the Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR kit lens that we used to test the camera performs an excellent job of eliminating camera shake when shooting video. Overall, this is a well-built, fully-featured DSLR that would make an excellent wildlife photography camera for the majority of photographers.

3 Top Options:

4. Sony Alpha A9 II

It outperformed my previous best score, which was obtained with the Nikon D500 (85 percent /98 percent), which was obtained with the A9 II. Finding only one out-of-focus photograph out of more than a thousand does not leave much space for misunderstanding or misunderstandings. As a result, even the shots that were “slightly out of focus” were difficult to differentiate from the sharp images, and I had to be quite selective.

Real-time autofocus tracking is the first tracking mode on a mirrorless camera that has been proven to be 100 percent reliable for this genre of photography. When shooting at 10 frames per second or 20 frames per second with the electronic shutter, the blackout-free live view makes it much easier to track the kites. There is no other mirrorless camera that can compete with this. In reality, its only opponent is the A9, which was its predecessor.

The A9 II has a new design that includes a larger grip, thicker buttons, and two UHS-II card slots, among other improvements. There is no comparison when it comes to battery life, and the body is weather resistant. The 24MP full frame sensor performs admirably in terms of dynamic range and high ISO sensitivity.

If you shoot in continuous mode with the electronic shutter, the bit depth of the RAW file reduces to 12-bits, which can hamper shadow recovery if you use a lot of post-processing. However, this hasn’t caused me any major issues so far.

When I tested the A9 shortly after its release in 2017, it received the highest overall score of any of the mirrorless cameras I’d tested (80 percent / 95 percent), and it was quite close to the Nikon D500 in terms of image quality and performance. Following this first release, the camera has received a number of software updates that have enhanced the autofocus and introduced new capabilities like real-time tracking and Animal Eye AF. As a result, it should come as no surprise that its score has improved to the point where it is on par with that of its successor, the A9 II, with whom it shares the same sensor and autofocus system.

3 Top Options:

5. CANON EOS 90D CAMERA: A LESS EXPENSIVE OPTION

If you’re looking to save some money, the Canon EOS 90D is a good option. Due to the fact that it has a crop sensor, it does not perform as well in low light as the Nikon D780, nor does it have the same luxury or well-built feel, however, it is still claimed as being weather-sealed, and it is significantly less expensive. It has a really comfortable feel to it, and its menu structure is extremely simple to browse through.

Despite the fact that it produces excellent overall image quality, its RAW noise management capability is only adequate at higher ISO settings. On the plus side, it boasts a quicker high-speed continuous shooting speed of 11 frames per second. However, its photo buffer is significantly smaller, and it has a buffer empty time of 10 seconds, which may cause you to lose time if you manage to fill it completely.

Although the camera does not have in-body image stabilization, it does a good job of reducing handheld camera shake when using the included kit lens, which is a plus. With its excellent autofocus mechanism, it is capable of tracking moving targets with reasonable accuracy.

If image quality and low-light performance are important to you, the Nikon is the way to go. However, if you’re trying to save money on a high-quality camera and free up more money in your budget for lenses, the Canon EOS Rebel T6i is a good choice.

3 Top Options:

6. Panasonic LUMIX FZ1000 II

If you’re searching for a bridge camera with a fixed superzoom lens, the Panasonic LUMIX FZ1000 II is the best camera for wildlife photography that we’ve tested with a fixed superzoom lens. Because of its DSLR-style body, which features a wide textured handgrip and a comfortable viewfinder, this bridge camera is well-built and quite pleasant to shoot with.

Its built-in lens provides a 25-400mm equivalent focal length range, allowing you to effortlessly zoom in on distant things such as birds or tiny animals without having to change lenses.

While the camera’s autofocus mechanism sometimes has difficulty following faces consistently, it does an excellent job of tracking moving objects when shooting video.

For nature photographers, it has a couple of useful features such as ‘Focus Stacking,’ which allows you to combine images taken at different focus points to create a wider focal range, as well as ‘Post Focus,’ which allows you to change the focus point of an image after it has been taken, both of which are useful. Furthermore, it has a high-speed continuous shooting mode that shoots at a rate of 10 frames per second, allowing you to capture short bursts of action shots.

Having said that, it has a limited image buffer, which is particularly noticeable when shooting in RAW format. It also has a long buffer empty time while shooting in RAW, which might cause interruptions to your shooting. On the other hand, when shooting in JPEG, it empties its buffer almost instantly. Additionally, it provides excellent overall image quality. In general, if you’re looking for a bridge camera for wildlife photography, this is a fantastic bargain option to consider.

3 Top Options:

7. NIKON COOLPIX P1000 with LONGER MAXIMUM ZOOM

You should choose the Nikon COOLPIX P1000 if you want a camera with a large zoom range. It’s somewhat larger and heavier than the Panasonic LUMIX FZ1000 II, which makes it a little more difficult to transport around. It does, however, have the largest zoom range of any fixed-lens camera, with a maximum zoom of 125x.

While the camera’s built-in lens has an impressive 24-3000mm full-frame equivalent focal length and effective optical stabilization to decrease camera shake, while shooting at extreme focal lengths, you may still need to use a tripod and a remote shutter to ensure sharp results. Nonetheless, it should allow you to take clear images or close-ups of animals or birds that are located at a great distance from you. But the camera’s autofocus technology is sluggish and unreliable, and while it can shoot burst photographs at a speed of 7 frames per second to capture fast movement, it can only shoot bursting bursts of seven images at a time.

Even under higher lighting circumstances, it maintains a high level of overall picture quality. If you want a more practical and versatile bridge camera, the Panasonic is the way to go; but, if you want the longest zoom on the market, the Nikon is the way to go.

3 Top Options:

8. Sony RX100 VII for wildlife photography

This little camera from Sony is our favorite for outdoor photography. It has the finest image quality and is the most compact of the cameras we’ve examined. If you’re looking for something small and portable for some light nature photography, a compact camera is an excellent choice because it’s easy to transport and can be taken with you wherever you go.

A small pop-up EVF is available if you prefer to shoot through a viewfinder, and the camera’s built-in lens can zoom up to a maximum 200mm equivalent focal length to capture things that are farther distant.

However, because of its smaller sensor, it is less suitable for shooting in low-light circumstances. However, its overall image quality is great, with an incredible dynamic range. With 357 stated detecting points and a subject detection option that allows you to pick between people and animals, the autofocus technology on this camera is likewise outstanding.

Its high-speed continuous shooting mode allows it to catch rapid bursts of action at a remarkable 20 frames per second, making it ideal for capturing fast action. It also has a ‘Single Burst’ shooting mode, which allows you to capture split-second action images by firing off a seven-image burst at speeds of 30, 60, or 90 frames per second.

It does have a limited photo buffer, particularly when shooting in RAW, and it takes a long time for its image memory to clear after it has been filled, which means that it may cause you to miss a shot if you are shooting in the dark. In addition, its battery life is subpar, though this might vary depending on the settings and usage patterns of the user. It does allow you to use the device while it is charging through USB, which is useful if you have a portable battery pack. Overall, if you’re looking for a simple point-and-shoot camera for wildlife photography, this is a fantastic choice.

3 Top Options:

Our Final Thoughts

Our selections above represent what we believe are currently the best wildlife cameras available for the majority of individuals to purchase, based on their individual requirements. We take into consideration the pricing, feedback from our visitors, and the availability of the item (no cameras that are difficult to find or almost out of stock in the U.S.).

If you prefer to make your own selection, here is a list of all of our camera reviews, organized by their suitability for sports and wildlife photography. Take care not to become engrossed in the minutia of the situation. There is no such thing as a perfectly good camera. In the end, your personal taste, preference, and shooting habits will be more important factors in your final selection.

Frequently Ask Questions

Originally posted on January 14, 2022 @ 8:06 am